Its feature set can be expanded by plug-ins programs developed and distributed independently of Photoshop that run inside it and offer new or enhanced features. In addition to raster graphics, Photoshop has limited abilities to edit or render text and vector graphics (especially through clipping path for the latter), as well as 3D graphics and video. Photoshop uses its own PSD and PSB file formats to support these features. Photoshop can edit and compose raster images in multiple layers and supports masks, alpha compositing and several color models. "to photoshop an image", " photoshopping", and " photoshop contest") although Adobe discourages such use. The software's name is often colloquially used as a verb (e.g. Since then, the software has become the most used tool for professional digital art, especially in raster graphics editing. It was originally created in 1987 by Thomas and John Knoll. I love the SU community, but the tainted corporate attitudes just dampens the joy.American English, British English, Arabic, Mandarin Chinese, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Romanian, Turkish and UkrainianĪdobe Photoshop is a raster graphics editor developed and published by Adobe Inc. This love it or leave it, agree to the EUA or else attitude frustrates consumers and some comments in this thread that basically say take it or leave just reinforces bad corporate behavior. But to charge $299.00 (as if 299 sounds better than 300), with new features that should be considered updates and not version upgrades is just plain monetizing a product for monetizing sake. I was not happy to open my wallet and say here is $120.00 for a yearly upgrade and sub-par new features, but that worked into the fact I was using to SU to make money. And the attempt to justify it with maintenance and phone support is, again, just a marketing ploy. When the company says you can buy a new one for three times the cost of the original, because we added better rollers. I make the analogy of buying software to buying a tool, let’s say a parallel rule to draw. I get coders should be paid well and software theft is a real concern. Somewhere along the line software companies gentrified EUA’s to the point of bend over and agree to the terms or you can walk. There happy clappy promotions of how newer versions have such great new features, like dashed lines or changing the Layer name Tags to dramatically increase productivity is, at best, a joke. that is into monetizing for monetizing sake. My problem with Trimble is that they have become a Marketing Co. Mistro, I basically agree with your position. I’m just a lover of Sketchup and want to see it survive. Generosity is not a business killer in fact it only helps. Programs like Max have such a following because they give it away like candy in schools growing a user base from the ground up. I disagree with many CG artists who call Sketchup a joke or a toy but the direction Trimble is taking is not helping win over more users. I just wish more software companies would put the community and access with better priority as that is how the company will stay in business IMO. I am still interested in getting my hands on SU 2020 if I can. The bright side is the versions of Sketchup I do have still and will continue to work and I will continue to use it. I have the same sadness about Thea Render too. I’m just saddened that the once thriving community I enjoyed since the days are now over as future Sketchup development seems to geared towards those who are fortunate enough to have a company pay or have enough work to sustain moving forward with Trimble as it is becoming further unreachable by hobbyists and new users who once had the option of downloading a copy to use on their desktop who will now only be using older versions. Trimble have every right to do what they want with their product and we are not by any laws entitled to our own wishes on how they conduct business for themselves. Some even are generous and give fixes and updates free unless it’s a major upgrade. This is the case with most software I own. For example users of a music program that cost $400 can buy an upgrade for $125-$150 no matter if they bought the program 10 years ago. There is no other software I have (besides Thea Render) that does not honnor existing customers in a way they do not buy the product over again at full initial cost. I just assumed a highly priced software would not charge a customer the exact same original high price again as an existing customer down the road. I was for some reason under the impression when I bought it that I would lose my maintenance support but pay more for an update later on than I would if I kept paying the update…which actually makes no sense thinking about that logic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |